Itse Sagay: There Is No Cause For Alarm Over China Loans

Itse Sagay: There Is No Cause For Alarm Over China Loans

Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) has described the uproar over the China loan as a storm in a teacup. He said many Nigerians are displaying ignorance over the issue.

It will be recalled that the House of Representatives had raised the alarm over clauses in Article 8(1) of the commercial loan agreement signed between Nigeria and Export-Import Bank of China. which allegedly concedes sovereignty of Nigeria to China in the $400 million loan for the Nigeria National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure Backbone Phase II Project, signed in 2018.

The controversial clause in the agreement signed by Federal Ministry of Finance (Borrower) on behalf of Nigeria and the Export-Import Bank of China (Lender) on September 5, 2018.

It provides that: “The Borrower hereby irrevocably waives any immunity on the grounds of sovereign or otherwise for itself or its property in connection with any arbitration proceeding pursuant to Article 8(5), thereof with the enforcement of any arbitral award pursuant thereto, except for the military assets and diplomatic assets.”

He said this when speaking in a chat with Daily Independent. Sagay said there is nothing unusual in the loan as Nigeria had experienced it before in the 70s.

He said:

“Looking at the reaction of the House of Representatives and a lot of Nigerians on this issue, my mind goes to the Biblical saying that ‘ my people perish for lack of knowledge’.

The problem with Nigeria and the crisis they have created over this issue is due to pure ignorance. That’s all. It is a storm in a tea cup over nothing”.

“The so- called Article 8 which was signed by Nigeria in its Chinese Bank loan is a standard term in all international loan agreement. It exists in current international law as customary international law. The first impact of this new law is Nigeria”.

“Nigeria has already experienced this in 1977 when a judgment was given against the Central Bank on the Cement Armada issue and we had to pay the money. And we paid. The Trendex Trading Company took us to a court in London. We paid because the court said we are not entitled to immunity when we go to the market to do transactions as ordinary men. That’s the law and we paid”.

“What we have signed now is nothing unusual. We have even gone through it before. I don’t expect that we will default. But if we default and the Chinese decides to take us to the Court of Arbitration. Which is most unlikely because of diplomatic relations”.

“If they did, we are bound and we have to accept that. It’s either we accept it or we shouldn’t even look for International loans. Nobody is going to give us any loan which is protected by immunity. You can’t be collecting loans all over the world and say nobody can sue you. That is not tolerable” .


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here